KPI Definition
|
Unit of Measure
|
Frequency
|
Remarks
|
Number
of changes for which change evaluations has been performed
|
Number
|
Monthly
|
This
KPI signifies efficiency of Change Evaluation process.
|
%age
of change evaluations performed w.r.t. the changes implemented during the
period
|
%
|
Monthly
|
This
KPI highlights how effectively the Change Evaluation process has been
implemented. Ideally this should be 100%.
|
Number
of changes where there are significant deviation in actual performance of the
change vis-à-vis predicted performance
|
Number
|
Weekly
|
This
KPI reflects how effectively a change evaluation is performed. Ideally the value
for this KPI should be zero.
|
Number
of instances where stakeholder expectation is incorrectly set
|
Number
|
Monthly
|
This
KPI highlights effectiveness of Change Evaluation process is correctly
setting the expectation of concerned stakeholders.
|
Number
of implemented changes for which actual benefit does not meet the acceptance
criteria
|
Number
|
Monthly
|
This
KPI reflects how effectively a change evaluation is performed. Ideally the value
for this KPI should be zero.
|
Number
of change evaluations which are not substantiated with change evaluation
report
|
Number
|
Weekly
|
This
KPI reflects how effectively a change evaluation process is being followed.
Ideally the value for this KPI should be zero.
|
Saturday, August 31, 2013
KPI: Change Evaluation
Saturday, August 24, 2013
KPI: Service Level Management
KPI Definition
|
Unit of Measure
|
Frequency
|
Remarks
|
Customer
satisfaction survey
|
CSAT Rating
|
Quarterly
|
This
survey would reflect the satisfaction level of the customers. Highlighting
customer dissatisfaction (if any), it would also enable focus on the key
areas into which the organization must look at to improve satisfaction
levels.
|
The
average number of days from the end date of an SLA evaluation term until the
date on which the
|
Days
|
Once per SLA evaluation term
|
This
KPI reflects the accuracy with which SLA review is performed
|
The
number of SLAs for which the customer has not been registered in the service
management application.
|
Number
|
Monthly
|
This
KPI reflects accuracy of the process to register customers. This number must
be zero. A non-zero value of the KPI would mean that all SLA performance for
the customer is not being tracked and reported.
|
Number
of Services not covered by effective OLAs
|
Number
|
|
This
KPI highlights the number of Services where SLAs are backed up by
corresponding OLAs vis-à-vis the total number of services being offered.
Ideally the value of this KPI must be zero.
Note: Effective OLA means
that the conditions in the OLA has to be at least same as that in SLA (to
effectively meet the committed SLAs) if not more stringent.
|
Number
of vendors with whom the organization does not have SLAs
|
Number
|
Quarterly
|
This
KPI highlights the inefficiency of Service Level Management process. SLA
should be there with all vendors.
|
Number
of Services not covered by effective UCs
|
Number
|
|
This
KPI highlights the number of Services where SLAs are backed up by
corresponding UCs vis-à-vis the total number of services being offered. Value
of this KPI must be zero.
Note: Effective UC means
that the all conditions in the UC have to be more stringent than that in SLA
(to effectively meet the committed SLAs and pass on a more stringent penalty
than that committed in SLA for UC violation).
|
Number
of Services/ SLAs where the agreed service levels are breached
|
|
|
This
KPI highlights that either the organization is incapable to meet the
committed SLA or are not being able to meet it despite having the capability.
It would accordingly enable to focus in identify and implementing corrective
actions. SLA should ideally be reworked with the customer if the IT
organization is incapable to meet the same.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)