Thursday, December 24, 2015

Snapshot of "Making SIAM Work - Adopting Service Integration And Management For Your Business"

Today IT services are being provisioned through infrastructure that is located within the organizations premises or 3rd party premises. Many IT organizations are also adopting various cloud based delivery models as well. Businesses utilize the IT services for delivering the business services, as business enabler, for business communications, etc. Thus, their reliance on IT and newer technologies is increasing every day.

With the advent of outsourcing the IT service delivery is itself dependent on service providers. A study suggests that on average every organization has outsourced to at least 3-5 IT service providers irrespective of the business domain. With multi-sourcing organizations tend to become a hotpot of the various practices from vendors. While at micro level the management lies with the vendors and they can do it well, the overall consolidation of services remains a challenge for the businesses. The Business services that are formed by the combination of smaller underlying services lack uniformity from design, to transitions to operations. This results in service packages that are either incompatible with each other or require a big integration effort. The biggest impact of this is clearly visible in slower time to market and increase in number of changes to the services .Vendors tend to solve this by associating themselves at higher levels, provide larger set of managed services. Here they call themselves as partners for the business, and try to drive services as seamlessly as possible, but in turn they charge heavily for this. Meanwhile there is no control of businesses on the individual (micro) services. All of this has made management & delivery of business services complex and challenging than ever before. Cost benefit passed on by these hybrid environments goes down the drain due to challenges in managing them. Thus, dilemma for the business is ‘How to get the control, uniformity and costs at an optimum level?’ SIAM is an answer to the Dilemma.
Moreover we come across situations where incumbent service providers are more often replaced by new service providers. The main driver of such changes is the difficulty of businesses to manage the operations. Where one service provider provides lower cost of operations, the other may provide technical acumen of highest level. Unfortunately, getting a balanced package is rare. The businesses try to cope with these shortcomings by adding the funds to projects over a period of time. And as the threshold is breached, businesses look for new suppliers to meet their needs. The change may be good in some aspects, but the cost associated with the transition and stabilization of services is painful and considerably high.

Since delivery of Services are fragmented in a multi-vendor environment with different service components being sourced from separate vendors, there are grey areas in context of ownership of overall service delivery. It is unfortunate that structure of multi-vendor or multi-sourced environment makes management of vendors besides governance of process and activities a very complicated task. Multi-sourced environments rely heavily on the core management competency of the business to deliver seamless services. Also, every organization has certain tools & processes which are unique to them and so is true for the vendor organizations. Thus, complexity of integration of multiple tools, processes and people besides the overall governance in a multi-vendor environment present a perplexing view of services that easily gives up on efficiency and effectiveness.

SIAM aims at strengthening this core and provides the directions to the suppliers and vendors to deliver defined outcomes. This drives effectiveness and efficiency of the services as expected by the business, but not as projected by the supplier.
Due to the grey area imposed by multi-vendor environment, we often find organizations to be in a situation where one vendor tries to pass on the accountability to another vendor for concerns related to delivery of services that have vendor inter-dependency and shared accountability. This creates the scenarios where there is finger pointing between the vendors resulting in key performance indicators getting blurred.

The resultant of scattered governance and multiple hierarchies is that the business suffers. They face an even daunting task to ensure that business service delivery to the end customer is not affected. Thus, the challenges of multi-vendor environment make the management of end customers, transitions and vendors even more challenging.

SIAM provides a structure to how the various suppliers interact and support each other. The dependencies between the services (by different vendors) are identified and SLA’s are designed to support the overarching services. The vendors get plugged into a structure (SIAM) that pushes suppliers to bring the best forward while appreciating the goods from other suppliers. The disputes are handled through a credit system (based on the dependencies), which leads to penalties and rewards.

Another challenge that organizations face is service and vendor consolidation during mergers & acquisitions or deconsolidation during demergers and spin-offs.

Thus, questions that every CxO possibly have are:
How can all the above challenges be simplified?
How can the impact of vendor change on their organization be minimized?
How can the effect and impact of mergers & acquisitions or spin-offs on service and vendor consolidation neutralised?

The answer is a highly flexible integration model which ensures that service management becomes a strategic asset for the organization. A scalable SIAM keeps its options open to accept or reject vendors based on their performance, while giving adequate level of feedback to improve. It brings an ease of plugging or de- plugging a vendor whenever the need be without impacting the business service delivery. Besides it also simplifies the process of service consolidation and deconsolidation at the business or strategic layer. This model is in line with the Service Management And Integration (SIAM).

My book "Making SIAM Work - Adopting Service Integration And Management For Your Business" provides explanation about the concepts of SIAM using a mechanical fluid-pump analogy. It provides a model which would effectively and successfully make SIAM work for your business, providing a clear step-by-step solution for adopting and implementing SIAM. It highlights the prerequisites and outputs that would enable organizations to use SIAM in achieving desired outcomes.

Sunday, November 22, 2015

The Service-Mâché

A Papier-mâché is an amazing material. It can create amazing shapes that can surprise as well as astound you. After all, it’s just the pieces of paper bound with adhesives like glue and starch to produce strong material that can take any shape. While paper is the key ingredient, the art of creating a Mâché lies in preparing the binding material (can be a mixture of water and flour or other starch, mixed to the consistency of heavy cream or complex chemical glues) and smearing it along.
Future of products and services lies in our ability to integrate the capabilities. With more and more innovations connecting to each other, the venue for bigger innovations opens up. The idea of integration is not new, but this has always been understood in piece meals. Understanding it in the full, at all levels and developing frameworks for managing it is a prerequisite to fulfill the needs of next generation products and services.
It’s been already predicted by a few in the industry that the next path breaking products and services would come from small players. This just highlights the predicament that can be caused due to number of products that try to make sense for a business. While some of them can aim at specific customer needs, remaining and most of them would have to focus on how to integrate and collaborate. Like brokers!!
Variety of products and services with multiple suppliers pose challenges that do not meet the eye easily. While utility of services and products is enhanced by integration; the warranty, which includes availability, need to be maintained as per the business requirements.
A Gartner research estimated the hourly cost of downtime as USD 42,000 in 2005. Another study by Gartner in 2011 pegged the cost of IT downtime at USD 26.5 billion in lost revenue each year.  Neverfail’s Outages Report 2013 suggests that average cost of data center downtime across industries is approximately USD 5,600 per minute. This does not attribute the loss to brand value or reputation.
Unplanned downtime, an evil that is cursed by every business, feeds on underlying shortcomings of an IT organization to manage itself. These include:
  • Reactive IT support and services
  • Disintegrated processes
  • Bad knowledge management across the organization
  • Improper mapping of business needs and IT capability
  • Lack of agility in IT to match business changes like mergers/demergers/acquisitions /spin-offs
All these get exaggerated in a multi-supplier (internal or external) environment and hence the need of integration ameliorates.
While there is a fair understanding of the need of integration in the market today, there is blatant confusion on the framework to be adopted. The frameworks too depict a conservative picture of their   applicability. Service providers have practically used their own capabilities as fences to the scope of integration frameworks, and this has resulted in restricted and rather insufficient research on the subject matter. That’s more so is a reason why we see so many frameworks, each, ironically, requiring a need of further integration.
The concept of integration has taken all these forms with one form differing from other in many aspects. The common concepts used are SIAM (Service Integration and Management), MSI (Multi-Supplier Integration) and SMI (Supplier Management Integration). Surprisingly, many use them interchangeably. Below is simple deciphering of a few:
  1. Legacy SI: Typically such suppliers are traditionally responsible for some of the process of Service Operation and Service Transition. They drive CSI for the activities (or technical towers) they own. If organizational processes for these lifecycle phases are available, they would follow these processes else they would use their proprietary set of processes. In many cases it has been experienced that either the documented processes does not exist or it is not followed. We can say that in Legacy SI the degree of process maturity is low.
  1. SMI: SMI are responsible for all processes of Service Operation and Service Transition besides most of the processes of Service Design. A matured SMI drives CSI for the processes that are in the scope of SMI across the suppliers. It is process driven as the basic building block is a centralized service management layer. It has a high degree of process adherence and process maturity.
  1. SIAM: SIAM is responsible for the entire lifecycle of ITSM. It drives continual evolution across the lifecycle phases and the suppliers through CSI.
However, the standard approach or framework has still eluded the industry.
The future of services is demanding. While resting on the shoulders of multiple suppliers, these call for -  better customer focus, alignment of business strategies, policies & objectives, return on value (ROV), proactive operations, technically advanced tools & platforms, governance across all layers and heavy automation; a comprehensive framework is needed that can address all and has space for improvements.
Not just to achieve seamless integration, this framework must be practical and aim to enable organizations with:
  • Ideation and conception of new products and services
  • Innovations
  • Faster response to market dynamics
  • Smoother production and delivery of products  and services
  • Satisfied workforce
  • Cumulative knowledge for decision making
  • Continual improvements

Meanwhile, should provide means to realise investment done in people, knowledge and technology.
SIAM is the concept that encapsulates all the above and when looked with broad sight, can reap benefits to businesses IT and Non-IT alike. SIAM must be implemented with a larger roadmap that looks at the strategic needs of the business while being able to deliver tactically. The suppliers must be enabled to work in tandem to yield synergy and innovation. The supplier’s addition and removal must be made efficient and so must be the creation of new products & services. A feedback mechanism should ensure that the right information flows for continual improvement of services. And the visibility of services must be ensured to business and management.
The Service-Mâché is going to be used to shape the businesses of future, with suppliers as paper strips and SIAM as the glue. How strong the glue is, depends on what it’s made up of.
The book on SIAM 'Making SIAM Work - Adopting Service Integration And Management For Your Businessfrom the authors tries to address the need of an approach or model for SIAM along with the above aspects of the Next Generation IT organization. It suggests a model for SIAM and the way it can be implemented in a practical manner.